What Is Respect? Part 5: The Workplace

This is the fifth post in a seven-part series; see parts 1-4 first.

The Study Thus Far

In this series, I endeavor to show from Scripture that respect is important and even commanded, and further that there are three categories of respect with narrowing applicability: courtesy, submission, and imitation. I write this series because, in spite of the clear teaching of Scripture, these differing categories are not clearly understood, and as a result the word “respect” often becomes a banner for generational values rather that sound doctrine, causing unnecessary conflicts and controversies.

Again, my main proposals for working through each level of the respect pyramid are as follows:

  • All respect is ultimately for God
  • Respect has three different forms or levels
  • The different levels have different theological bases
  • The different levels have different requirements

I am still working through the five sub-categories in the second tier of respect, which I have called submission to authority. After the previous posts on marriage, parenting, and government, this post will seek to examine submission in the workplace. As I work through each sub-category of submission in the respect pyramid, I am doing so according to five main scriptural principles more fully explained in my second post:

  1. All authority is God’s authority (Romans 13:1-2).
  2. Our use of authority makes claims about God (Genesis 1:26-30).
  3. All leadership should be servant leadership (Matthew 20:25-28).
  4. The goal of authority is to encourage godly living (1 Timothy 2:1-3).
  5. Submission is living out your position before God (1 Peter 2:13-15).

This series is seven posts long so that each sub-category of submission can receive its own post.

  1. Introduction & Courtesy
  2. Submission, Part 1: Marriage
  3. Submission, Part 2: Parenting
  4. Submission, Part 3: Government
  5. Submission, Part 4: Workplace [this post]
  6. Submission, Part 5: Church
  7. Imitation & Conclusions

But before we can examine submission in the workplace, we need to say a word on a concept that will occur frequently in this post: slavery in Scripture.

Slavery in Scripture

In recent years, the Bible has come under attack for its seeming endorsement of slavery. There are multiple cultural and historical factors lumped into this discussion, but two main points need to be stated plainly up front: the Bible does not abolish slavery, yet the Bible argues for the dignity of slaves. In today’s cultural milieu, these two statements seem contradictory – how can a person have basic human dignity if they are owned by another person? Some of the struggle here is one of foisting modern cultural values upon the past, but the major struggle seems to be how God could allow such an institution to continue even though it is prone to such evils and abuses. As is often the case, some information will help us to better discern the answer to the question; to that end, I will briefly examine the biblical handling of slavery in the contexts of the Old and New Testament.

But another point must be made before we can deal with the Old Testament view of slavery: the Mosaic Law allowed for slavery. Yet, on the heels of this statement another must be immediately made: the Mosaic Law heavily regulated slavery for the benefit of the slave. First, while the Law allowed for slavery, kidnapping a person to enslave them was a capital offense (Ex. 21:16). Second, while the Law bans the permanent slavery only of Israelites (Ex. 21:2; Lev. 25:44-46; Deut. 15:12), it also explicitly forbade abusing foreigners in any way (Ex. 22:21; 23:9; Lev. 19:33; Deut. 10:18-19). Third, while the Law does state that a man can enslave a female war captive as a wife (Num. 31:27-18; Deut. 21:14), he must allow her a month of mourning before treating her as his wife, and once she becomes his wife – even if not his first wife (Ex. 21:10-11) – he can no longer treat her as a slave and sell her since she is a member of Israelite society (Deut. 21:10-14). Fourth, we must acknowledge that, while the Law allowed for the cultural practice of slavery in its ancient context, it gave rights to slaves which they lacked in other Ancient Near Eastern societies: sharing in the benefits of rest and feast days (Deut. 16:11, 14; Ex. 23:12), protection from physical abuse (Ex. 21:26-27), and the command for Israelites to shelter runaway slaves (Deut. 23:15-16). In fact, most slavery in Old Testament Israel is better labelled “servanthood,” since it usually concerned impoverished Israelites voluntarily indenturing themselves either to pay off a debt or escape abject poverty (Lev. 25:39-43) [1]. Further, all debts were cancelled and Israelite slaves released every seven years (Deut. 15:1-6), and a master was required by the Law to provide a released Israelite slave with provisions and wealth to prevent future enslavement (Deut. 15:12-15). All of this is based on the cardinal Old Testament doctrine that all people are made in God’s image (Gen. 1:26-27). So, while slavery was permitted in Old Testament Israel, it was not presented as an ideal but regulated to prevent abuse and preserve life.

The point that ancient slavery in the Roman Empire was not identical to the historic enslavement of Africans in the U.S.A. has perhaps been over-emphasized. While it is true that U.S. slavery was based upon ethnicity while Roman slavery was not, it is also true that there was an extensive caste system in Roman society which placed foreign slaves at the bottom with the worst treatment and jobs. Also, while it is true that Roman slavery made a way for slaves to earn their freedom and even citizenship upon their release, it is also true that a slave in both systems lacked rights and was subject to their owner’s whim, leading to frequent physical and sexual abuse [2]. Again, while it is true that some slavery in Rome was essentially indentured servitude for a specified time, it is also true that many slaves were captured prisoners of war [3]. Yet it must be remembered that one often could not identify a Roman slave by sight alone, and some slaves in this system were elevated close to the top of the social ladder [4]; close to one fifth of Rome itself was enslaved at its height [5], while in the rest of the Empire the average was around 10% [6]. In this cultural environment, the New Testament did not seek to abolish slavery, but instead reminded Christian slaveowners to treat their slaves justly (Eph. 6:9) and that they were accountable to their own slaveowner – God – for the treatment of their slaves (Col. 4:1). Paul tells Philemon to view his returned slave, Onesimus, not as a slave but as a brother in Christ (Philemon 16), and though he stops short of commanding all Christian slaveowners to release their slaves, he does tell enslaved believers to seek their freedom if possible (1 Cor. 7:21). As was the case in Israel, God’s regulations of Roman slavery in the New Testament were designed to elevate and protect those who were enslaved.

In summary, objection to the Bible as a whole on the basis that it does not openly condemn and abolish slavery is misguided by a modern assumption that an enslaved person cannot be viewed as having equal value, which is what the biblical treatment of slavery teaches. The Bible does not seek to overturn every social structure that could be abused, else it would of necessity abolish all authority structures; rather, it teaches fallen people living in fallen social structures how to be godly within those structures. For slaves and slaveowners, that means treating each other as having equal value before God, even if they have a distinction in social status and authority. Ultimately, this is impossible without the Gospel, which teaches:

“There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is no male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.” (Gal. 3:28)

Which is why, historically, slaveowners in the United States prevented slaves from learning about Christianity until they had created a distorted version of it that supported slavery [7]. Christianity inherently lifts the status of enslaved people.

Submission Sub-Category 3: Employment

So, why was it necessary to discuss slavery before examining what biblical submission means in the workplace? Put simply, our modern system of employment was less common in the ancient world. Then, most of what we think of today as jobs were done by slaves [8], so while Scripture does not speak directly about employers and employees, the principles it lays down for living godly lives in the fallen system of slavery also apply to living in the fallen system of capitalism. And what we see in studying the passages that deal with slaves and slaveowners is that the five principles of submission which I have outlined elsewhere in this study also apply here.

All authority is God’s authority – It is important to note that in the Old Testament context it was God himself who canonized a system for managing slavery in ancient Israel, explicitly declaring himself as the head of the hierarchy: God à slaveowner à slave. The same hierarchy is enacted in the New Testament, when God says to slaveowners regarding their slaves, “he who is both their [i.e., the slave’s] Master and yours is in heaven” (Eph. 6:9) and commands slaves to “be subject [i.e., submit] to your masters with all respect” (1 Pet. 2:18). What this submission entails will be worked out later on, but it suffices now to say that the New Testament declares God as the one who calls the shots in slavery; for our situation today, that means God holds the right to tell both employers and employees how they ought to act – he is master over both.

Our use of authority makes claims about God – Scripture makes this principle the least explicitly, possibly because there were fewer slaveowners than slaves in the early church. The pagan philosopher Celsus described this movement as consisting of “only foolish and low individuals, and persons devoid of perception, and slaves, and women, and children."[9]. Regardless, the principle still stands as God has established himself as head of the slavery hierarchy. This may seem a strange statement to make, but Paul and other New Testament writers refer to themselves repeatedly as slaves of Christ (Rom. 1:1; Phil. 1:1; Tit. 1:1; Jas. 1:1; 2 Pet. 1:1; Jude 1), and Paul describes salvation as passing from an old master – sin – to a new master – God (Rom. 6:16-23). While this is not endorsement of everything that ever happens under slavery (just as God does not endorse all evils done in marriage, parenting, government, and churches), God does not see identifying himself as the good master as incongruous with his good and loving nature. Indeed, both Greek words used to refer to slaveowners in the New Testament are used for God as well: the first is kurios (Eph. 6:5; Col. 4:1), the word translated “Lord” when referring to Christ; the second is despotēs (1 Tim. 6:1; Titus 2:9; 1 Pet. 2:18), used to describe God as sovereign ruler (Luke 2:29; Acts 4:24; 2 Pet. 2:1; Jude 4 Rev. 6:10). Since God describes himself as the master of believers, believing masters are responsible to be the kind of master that God himself is, lest they promote a blasphemous picture of him. Therefore, God commands them, “stop your threatening” (Eph. 6:9) and “treat your bondservants justly and fairly” (Col. 4:1), for he himself is patient, just, and fair (Ex. 34:6-7). What this means in the modern context is that employers of today must likewise treat their employees in such a way that they present them with an accurate picture of God.

All leadership should be servant leadership – Again, the specific New Testament commands on this aspect with regard to slavery are few and general because of the disproportion of slaves to masters in the early church, yet Scripture is not silent. I have already listed two of the commands given to slaveowners in the previous section: “stop your threatening” (Eph. 6:9) and “treat your bondservants justly and fairly” (Col. 4:1). These commands clarify two key principles for slaveowners and, by extension, employers. First, the ends do not justify the means. There are tactics used by employers that, while they may be effective in boosting production, are nevertheless sinful, such as threatening and injustice; the latter likely refers primarily to unjust wages [10], a practice clearly condemned elsewhere in Scripture for both slaveowners and employers (Lev. 19:13; Deut. 24:14-15; Mal. 3:5; Jas. 5:4). God cares how employers treat their employees.

Second, elevate rather than degrade those under you. Rather than following the norms of the world around them, which viewed slaves as property to be abused for the benefit of the slaveowner, Paul urges justice and fairness in all dealings with human beings in God’s image, slaves included. While Peter does command slaves to submit even to unjust masters (1 Pet. 2:18), no believer should aspire to be this type of master or employer (Ps. 9:12; 12:5; Micah 6:8) because “you also have a Master in heaven” (Col. 4:1) and “the wrongdoer will be paid back for the wrong he has done, and there is no partiality.” (Col. 3:25). God holds everyone accountable for their actions toward others, whether employer or employee.

But the next principle was even more shocking to the ancient world, for after describing the responsibilities of slaves to their masters, Paul says “Masters, do the same to them” (Eph. 6:9). This does not mean that masters were to submit to their slaves’ authority, but that they were also to carry out their role “with fear and trembling, with a sincere heart, as you would Christ” (v.5), remembering Christ’s words: “as you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to me” (Mat. 25:45). He calls them to join their slaves in, “doing the will of God from the heart, rendering service with a good will as to the Lord and not to man, knowing that whatever good anyone does, this he will receive back from the Lord, whether he is a bondservant or is free” (v.6-7). So, the third principle for slaveowners and employers is that they should treat those under them as their equals, both as images of God and as either siblings in Christ or those in need of him. As with the other sub-categories of submission, here too God places the burden upon the higher position. It is not enough for a believing employer to treat those under them ‘as good as the world does’; they are called to be radically different in showing sacrificial, loving leadership for the benefit of their employees, and so to be “blameless and innocent, children of God without blemish in the midst of a crooked and twisted generation, among whom you shine as lights in the world” (Phil. 2:15).

The goal is godly living – Here again there are few specific passages dealing with this principle for masters and slaves; though Scripture is not silent – the principle becomes apparent with a little work. As has been shown already, although slaves are commanded to submit even to wicked masters, enduring unjust suffering for God’s glory (1 Pet. 2:18-19), Scripture is also clear that such is not the ideal and that masters should treat their servants well (Eph. 6:9; Col. 4:1). But for a grander picture, we must zoom out from passages that deal only with slavery. The New Testament is clear that the primary relationship between any two believers – whether they are husband and wife, parent and child, ruler and citizen, master and slave, or pastor and congregant – is the bond of Christ that makes them one family (1 Cor. 12:13; Gal. 3:27-28; Col. 3:11). What this means for our study is that the superior is bound to fulfill all of the one-another commands of the New Testament toward the inferior [11].And why? So that “the whole body, joined and held together by every joint with which it is equipped, when each part is working properly, makes the body grow so that it builds itself up in love” (Eph. 4:16). Like husbands, parents, and governments, masters and employers are not to inhibit the spiritual growth of those under them but rather foster it, for the goal of all authority is to encourage godly living.

Submission is living out your position before God – So, what are the responsibilities of slaves to their masters, and by extension of employees to their employers? As was the case with children to their parents and citizens to their government (though conspicuously lacking for wives to their husbands – see my second post), slaves are commanded to obey their masters (Eph. 6:5; Col. 3:22), and the manner of this obedience is “as you would Christ” (Eph. 6:5). As I have done for all previous authorities, I must caveat that we do not follow sinful leaders into sin (Acts 5:29), so leadership which would harm or degrade a human being in God’s image – including the slave – must not be followed; to do so would be sin. This caveat freed the ancient slave from obeying the sexual advances of her or his master, as it does the modern employee, of whom 10% of men and 25% of women are likely to experience sexual harassment from a workplace authority [12]. Additionally, I should note that this is the only hierarchy for which Scripture explicitly gives an escape strategy: “But if you can gain your freedom, avail yourself of the opportunity” (1 Cor. 7:21). By extension, a modern employee is free to change jobs if they feel compelled to sin.

But let us return to the obligations of the slave. He must not only obey, but do so “with fear and trembling, with a sincere heart” (Eph. 6:5; cf. Col. 3:22) and “not by the way of eye-service, as people-pleasers, but as bondservants of Christ, doing the will of God from the heart” (Eph. 6:6; cf. Col. 3:22); “they are to be well-pleasing, not argumentative, not pilfering, but showing all good faith” (Tit. 2:9-10). The slave must live out his position in a way that reflects on God correctly: “so that in everything they may adorn the doctrine of God our Savior” (Tit. 2:10). If the master is a believer, the standard is yet higher, for then slaves “must not be disrespectful on the ground that they are brothers; rather they must serve all the better since those who benefit by their good service are believers and beloved” (1 Tim. 6:2). In summary, Christian slaves are commanded not only to fulfill their obligations, but also to have the right heart in the process, one that submits to God and therefore to his appointees in the hierarchy as well as serves the authority out of Christlike love and a genuine interest in their well-being as an image of God. To flip the summary statement I gave for employers, It is not enough for a believing employee to treat those over them ‘as good as the world does’; they are called to be radically different in showing sacrificial, loving service for the benefit of their employers, and so to be “blameless and innocent, children of God without blemish in the midst of a crooked and twisted generation, among whom you shine as lights in the world” (Phil. 2:15).

Conclusion

This has been another long post, but there were many things I needed to say in laying the foundation to draw out the principles from these passages. I hope that I have sparked some helpful meditation for you, and that you go on to discern and study these matters with the guidance of the Holy Spirit – don’t just take my work for it! This matter of respect is important to me because it is important to God, and he wrote about it in his word; though the vocabulary is different, we need to study the Word to better understand how God desires for us to live. As I look around at this world and its many injustices, one that stands out to me is the abuse of the individual employee by the system in which he or she works, and this was also a great concern for the writers of Scripture. On that note, I leave you with the words of Psalm 12.

Save, O LORD, for the godly one is gone;
for the faithful have vanished from among the children of man.
Everyone utters lies to his neighbor;
with flattering lips and a double heart they speak.
 
May the LORD cut off all flattering lips,
the tongue that makes great boasts,
those who say, “With our tongue we will prevail,
our lips are with us; who is master over us?”
 
“Because the poor are plundered, because the needy groan,
I will now arise,” says the LORD;
“I will place him in the safety for which he longs.”
The words of the LORD are pure words,
like silver refined in a furnace on the ground,
purified seven times.
 
You, O LORD, will keep them;
you will guard us from this generation forever.
On every side the wicked prowl,
as vileness is exalted among the children of man.


[1] Paul Copan, Is God a Moral Monster?, pp.124-127.

[2] Nadya Williams, Cultural Christians in the Early Church, p.97

[3] James Jeffers, The Greco-Roman World of the New Testament Era, p.227

[4] James Jeffers, The Greco-Roman World of the New Testament Era, p.189

[5] Everett Ferguson, Backgrounds of Early Christianity, p.59

[6] James Jeffers, The Greco-Roman World of the New Testament Era, p.221

[7] Craig S. Keener, The IVP Bible Background Commentary: New Testament, “Philemon: Introduction”

[8] James Jeffers, The Greco-Roman World of the New Testament Era, p.224

[9] Origen, Against Celsus, ch.49

[10] Horst Balz and Gerhard Schneider, The Exegetical Dictionary of the New Testament, vol.3, p.39

[11] Love (John 13:34-35; 15:12, 17; Rom. 12:10; 13:8; 1 Thess. 3:22; 4:9; 1 Pet. 1:22; 4:8; 1 John 3:11, 23; 4:7, 11, 12; 2 John 5); live in harmony (Rom. 12:16; 15:5, 7); edify, don’t sinfully judge/hinder (Rom. 14:13); greet (Rom. 16:16; 1 Cor. 16:20; 1 Pet. 4:14); care for (1 Cor. 12:25); serve (John 13:14; Gal. 5:13); bear burdens (Gal 6:1-5); bear with (Eph. 4:2; Col. 3:13); be kind (Eph. 4:32); value more than yourselves (Phil 2:3); encourage (1 Thess. 5:11); do good (1 Thess. 5:15); stir up to love and good works (Heb. 10:24); confess your sins (James 5:16); show hospitality (1 Pet. 4:9).

[12] Kathleen C. Basile, Ashley S. D’Inverno, and Jing Wang, “National Prevalence of Sexual Violence by a Workplace-Related Perpetrator,” National Library of Medicine

All Scripture verses come from the ESV.

Comments